Apaperbedaan antara HiSilicon Kirin 810 dan Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G? Temukan mana yang lebih baik dan performa mereka secara keseluruhan dalam peringkat chipset ponsel.
When a new product comes out, it is normal for people to inquire about the novelties they have with respect to predecessors, especially if we talk about SoCs. Knowing if the new processor is on par with old technologies or completely revolutionizes the market is essential to determine if it is worth the investment. Today Huawei has presented the chip they will use in the new Nova 5, the Kirin 810. This processor that promises to be a direct competition of the Snapdragons series 7, and has left everyone surprised thanks to its performance. However, for you to have a clearer idea, we present this Kirin 810 vs Kirin 710 vs Kirin 980 Comparison, and so you can see why the next mid-range smartphones look so promising. What's Inside 1Kirin 810 vs Kirin 710 vs Kirin 980 Comparison – Specification SheetKirin 810 vs Kirin 710 vs Kirin 980 Comparison – CPU ComparisonKirin 810 vs Kirin 710 vs Kirin 980 Comparison – Comparison GPUKirin 810 vs. Kirin 710 vs. Kirin 980 Comparison – Other Specs ComparisonConclusionOverall Winner Kirin 810 Kirin 810 vs Kirin 710 vs Kirin 980 Comparison – Specification Sheet SoCKirin 810Kirin 710Kirin 980 CPU2 X Cortex-A76 6 X Cortex-A55 X Cortex-A73 4 X Cortex-A53 X Cortex-A76 2 X Cortex-A76 4 X Cortex-A55 GPUMali-G52Mali-G51Mali-G76 MemoryLPDDR4LPDDR4 1866MHz2-LPDDR4x 1866MHz ModemDual VoLTELTE 12 / 13 DL= 600Mbps UL= 150MbpsLTE 21 / 13 DL= 1400Mbps UL= 150Mbps Mfc. Process7nm TSMC12nm TSMC7nm LPP Kirin 810 vs Kirin 710 vs Kirin 980 Comparison – CPU Comparison The revelation has been today, but we already have important data about the performance of the new Kirin 810. That is why we can make a complete comparison with its brothers and competitors. The first thing is to talk about the CPU, which will be responsible for the vast majority of processes and the management of artificial intelligence. The Kirin 810 has raised the bar within Huawei, although it is not the first SoC of the company to adopt the 7nm TSMC lithography, it is still an engineering achievement. This process represents a 50% improvement in the density of transistors with respect to 8nm, and 64% with respect to 10nm. This translates into more power in the same space. With regard to the structure of the CPU, this octa-core chip is made up of 2 high-performance Cortex-A76 units at and 6 Cortex-A55 units at Additionally, for the AI tasks the chip comes with a DaVinci NPU from the same manufacturer, being a great progress to separate the use of third-party hardware. For its part, and following this Kirin 810 vs. Kirin 710 vs. Kirin 980 Comparison, we break down what the Kirin 710 offers us. This chip, dedicated to the mid-range, has a 12nm lithography, and although at the time it was revolutionary for Huawei, is already somewhat outdated. The good thing is that it remains in the fight thanks to its octa-core architecture with four Cortex-A73 units at and 4 Cortex-A53 at Another feature that keeps it relevant is that it also has NPU for AI functions, worth admiring on a mid-range chip. For the benefit of the comparison, it is fair to mention the other Huawei 7nm processor, the Kirin 980. This processor was born as a competitor of the highest range in the company, standing above the Snapdragon 845 thanks to its octa-core architecture, with 2 Cortex-A76 at 2 Cortex-A76 at and 4 Cortex-A55 at Of the three participants, it is the only one with a different architecture having high and medium performance units. It also has a dual NPU, achieving a unique performance with regard to AI. Also Read Exynos 7904 vs Snapdragon 670 vs Snapdragon 675 Comparison Winner Kirin 980 Reason Better cores Kirin 810 vs Kirin 710 vs Kirin 980 Comparison – Comparison GPU We continue this Kirin 810 vs. Kirin 710 vs. Kirin 980 Comparison in the GPU section. Huawei has always been a pioneer in the use of modern graphics units, and this has not been the exception. Following the trend of creating unique experiences for games, the Kirin 810 uses a customized Mali-G52 GPU to take advantage of the AI features of the Smartphone in which it is installed. It has also been promised that HD games will always work at a minimum of 60FPS. The Kirin 710 is maintained with a mid-range GPU to its credit, the Mali-G51, a unit that today is still very good for image reproduction thanks to its speed of 650MHz. The Kirin 980 premiered at the time a powerful 7nm Mali-G76 GPU unit with a speed of 720MHz. This offers amazing game speeds and 60FPS in the vast majority of games. This is a very closed section between Kirin 810 and 980, and it will depend on how each is optimized in conjunction with Huaweis Turbo technology. Winner Kirin 810 Reason To be mid-range, it is up to the big ones in performance. Kirin 810 vs. Kirin 710 vs. Kirin 980 Comparison – Other Specs Comparison We finished this Kirin 810 vs. Kirin 710 vs. Kirin 980 Comparison with other highlights among these SoCs. The Kirin 810 is still a mystery in some specifications, but for now, we can confirm the use of IVP + ISP to capture photographs, significantly improving the image quality, contrast, and brightness. We also know that it supports Dual VoLTE, perfect to enjoy 2 SIM cards with 4G support. The Kirin 710 is not far behind in qualities. It is also compatible with Dual VoLTE and offers downloads speeds of up to 300mbps and upload speeds of up to 150mbps thanks to the Cat12 and Cat13 protocols. The Kirin 980, meanwhile, has dual ISP for capturing photos, significantly reducing the time it takes to capture it and with lower energy consumption. At the connection level, it has a LTE21 for downloads and LTE13 for the upload, which give it higher speeds than the Kirin 810. Winner Kirin 810 Reason It adapts very well the characteristics of the high range Conclusion Overall Winner Kirin 810 This new SoC that fully enters the mid-range promises to be a revolution in terms of refreshing the power of new terminals. The 7nm lithography is settling more and more between the processors, and this is the first sample of it. Huawei is striving to demonstrate that they can build an entirely own ecosystem around which to work, not only in the highest range but in more accessible ones. The Kirin 810 turns out to be a pleasant surprise, and we can only hope to see its result in the market. HiSiliconKirin 955: 8 (4x2 0 Store: EMDD Store Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G Mobile Platform, Launched 2021, SM8350, Quick Charge 5, Adreno 660 GPU, Octa-Core,2 This study specially analyses the impact of Covid-19 outbreak on the AI Accelerator, covering the supply chain analysis, impact assessment to the AI Accelerator market size growth

VS We compared the 4-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 Adreno 530 with the newer 8-core HiSilicon Kirin 710 Mali-G51 MP4 SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5GamingSpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 Performs better in floating-point computationsShows better up to 25% AnTuTu 9 score – 243K vs 195K Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 710 Announced 2-years and 9-months laterHas 4 more coresHigher GPU frequency ~60%Has a smaller size transistor 12 versus 14 nm Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 62161 70901 GPU 87560 33222 Memory 34897 33714 UX 58362 57642 Total score 243674 195658 Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability - 84% Graphics test 4 FPS 3 FPS Score 792 554 Gaming Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games PUBG Mobile - 51 FPS [Medium] Call of Duty Mobile - 29 FPS [Low] Fortnite - 25 FPS [Low] Shadowgun Legends - 56 FPS [Low] World of Tanks Blitz - 52 FPS [Ultra] Mobile Legends Bang Bang - 60 FPS [Ultra] Device - Huawei Honor 10 Lite 1080 x 2340 We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors. Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 820 and Kirin 710 CPU Architecture 2x GHz – Kryo2x GHz – Kryo 4x GHz – Cortex-A734x GHz – Cortex-A53 Cores 4 8 Frequency 2150 MHz 2200 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8-A L1 cache 64 KB 256 KB L2 cache 1 MB 512 KB L3 cache - 1 MB Process 14 nanometers 12 nanometers Transistor count 2 billion billion TDP 11 W 5 W Graphics GPU name Adreno 530 Mali-G51 MP4 Architecture Adreno 500 Bifrost GPU frequency 624 MHz 1000 MHz Execution units 2 4 Shading units 256 64 FLOPS 319 Gigaflops Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4 LPDDR4X Memory frequency 1866 MHz 1866 MHz Bus 2x 32 Bit 2x 32 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s - Max size 8 GB 6 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Hexagon 680 No Storage type eMMC UFS eMMC UFS Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2340 x 1080 Max camera resolution 1x 28MP, 2x 13MP 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 30FPS Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS Video codecs VP8, VP9 Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem X12 - 4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 12 5G support No No Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 5 4 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 820 58 Total votes 114 Related Comparisons Comments Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 710 and Snapdragon 820, or ask any questions

28999 USD (Amazon) The HiSilicon Kirin 710 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2018 and contains 8 processor cores (4x Cortex VS We compared two 8-core processors Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 with Adreno 616 graphics and HiSilicon Kirin 710 Mali-G51 MP4. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5GamingSpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 Performs better in floating-point computationsShows better up to 32% AnTuTu 9 score – 257K vs 195KHas a smaller size transistor 10 versus 12 nm Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 710 Higher GPU frequency ~33% Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 73587 70901 GPU 72514 33222 Memory 35412 33714 UX 75197 57642 Total score 257720 195658 Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression 76 Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection images/s images/s Speech recognition 26 words/s words/s Machine learning 22 images/s images/s Camera shooting 12 images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 96% 84% Graphics test 3 FPS 3 FPS Score 550 554 Gaming Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games PUBG Mobile 39 FPS [Ultra] 51 FPS [Medium] Call of Duty Mobile 35 FPS [Ultra] 29 FPS [Low] Fortnite 26 FPS [Low] 25 FPS [Low] Shadowgun Legends 53 FPS [Low] 56 FPS [Low] World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS [Ultra] 52 FPS [Ultra] Mobile Legends Bang Bang 55 FPS [Ultra] 60 FPS [Ultra] Device Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite 1080 x 2340 Huawei Honor 10 Lite 1080 x 2340 We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors. Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 710 and Kirin 710 CPU Architecture 2x GHz – Kryo 360 Gold Cortex-A756x GHz – Kryo 360 Silver Cortex-A55 4x GHz – Cortex-A734x GHz – Cortex-A53 Cores 8 8 Frequency 2200 MHz 2200 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8-A L1 cache - 256 KB L2 cache 384 KB 512 KB L3 cache 1 MB 1 MB Process 10 nanometers 12 nanometers Transistor count 3 billion billion TDP 5 W 5 W Graphics GPU name Adreno 616 Mali-G51 MP4 Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost GPU frequency 750 MHz 1000 MHz Execution units 2 4 Shading units 128 64 FLOPS 384 Gigaflops Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 1866 MHz 1866 MHz Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s - Max size 8 GB 6 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Hexagon 685 No Storage type eMMC UFS eMMC UFS Max display resolution 3360 x 1440 2340 x 1080 Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 16MP 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 30FPS Video playback 4K at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS Video codecs VP8, VP9 VP8, VP9 Audio codecs Qualcomm Aqstic, aptX, aptX HD AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem X15 LTE - 4G support LTE Cat. 15 LTE Cat. 12 5G support No No Download speed Up to 800 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 5 4 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 710 185 Total votes 243 Related Comparisons Comments Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 710 and Snapdragon 710, or ask any questions

Onthe CPU cores of snapdragon 730 and Kirin 810, it adopts the cluster design of two large and six small cores, and the A76 + A55 architecture of arm, The advantage of Qilin 810 is more obvious. From the process point of view, Qilin 810 uses 7Nm process, and uses 2Γ—2.27ghz a766x1.88ghz A55, GPU is mail G52, snapdragon 730 uses 8nm process, uses 2Γ—2.2ghz a766x1.8ghz A55, GPU is Adreno 618.

TheHiSilicon Kirin 710A is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It is based on the Kirin 710 , but manufactured in 14nm FinFET at SMIC (China) versus the
Prosof HiSilicon Kirin 810. Supports 128% higher memory bandwidth (31.78 against 13.91 GB/s) Performs 78% better in floating-point computations. Higher GPU frequency (~49%) Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 10 nm) Shows better (up to 30%) AnTuTu 9 score - 372K vs 287K. Better instruction set architecture.
TheHiSilicon Kirin 820e is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced 2022 and contains 8 processor cores. One fast ARM Cortex-A76 core with
HiSiliconKirin 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625. HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon 625. Cpu Benchmark avec benchmarks. HiSilicon Kirin 710: Qualcomm Snapdragon 625: 1.70 GHz: La frΓ©quence: 2.00 GHz: 2.20 GHz: Turbo (1 cΕ“ur) 2.00 GHz: 2.20 GHz: Turbo (tous les cΕ“urs) 2.00 GHz: 8: Noyaux: 8: Non:
HasTrustZone. HiSilicon Kirin 810 ( ARM Cortex-A55) Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 ( ARM Cortex-A75) A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM). 7. upload speed.
.
  • c28zc3uvjt.pages.dev/306
  • c28zc3uvjt.pages.dev/466
  • c28zc3uvjt.pages.dev/506
  • c28zc3uvjt.pages.dev/183
  • c28zc3uvjt.pages.dev/441
  • c28zc3uvjt.pages.dev/728
  • c28zc3uvjt.pages.dev/978
  • c28zc3uvjt.pages.dev/600
  • c28zc3uvjt.pages.dev/998
  • c28zc3uvjt.pages.dev/923
  • c28zc3uvjt.pages.dev/21
  • c28zc3uvjt.pages.dev/225
  • c28zc3uvjt.pages.dev/564
  • c28zc3uvjt.pages.dev/652
  • c28zc3uvjt.pages.dev/204

    • kirin 810 vs snapdragon 710